Bostonist apologizes for that terrible headline and promises not to do that ever again. The Boston Globe breathlessly reports that a Marshfield man was miraculously healed by a Catholic cardinal who died 100 years ago, once again making the case that journalistic standards will not stand in the way of their printing a completely idiotic story. According to the article, local septuagenarian Jack Sullivan is helping drive a movement to convince the Vatican to make Cardinal John Henry Newman a saint, which requires that the 19th century corpse perform at least two miracles. Luckily, the first of those miracles has already occurred, and the Boston Globe has the undeniable proof! According the article, the order of events is this: Jack Sullivan has a bad back and is diagnosed with spinal stenosis (a narrowing of the spine that puts pressures on nerves, causing pain). He sees a TV program about Cardinal John Henry Newman in which an appeal is made for viewers to report any Newman-related miracles. He prays to Newman. He wakes up the next day feeling better. MIRACLE. Or . . . not? From the article: For Sullivan, who said he has remained pain-free since his prayers were answered . . . Had intrepid journalist Jenna Russell bothered to read the second page of her own article, she would be aware that this is misleading at best and complete bullshit at worst. She writes that after his prayer for help, Sullivan remained free of pain for eight months, but after his last class, the pain returned, he said. He had surgery at New England Baptist Hospital in Boston on Aug. 9, 2001. So instead of “man in serious pain prays for help and is healed,” the story is more like “man in serious pain

See original here:
Skepchick: Sain’t Misbehavin’