Joseph Laycock is a graduate of Harvard Divinity School who is currently working toward his doctorate at BU. He recently published a book called Vampires Today: The Truth About Modern Vampirism . (Pro tip: they do not sparkle.) Bostonist: What should we know about vampires? Joe Laycock: There is previous scholarship about vampires, but it’s mostly been done by “occult crime” specialists, and it’s been done to present vampires as totally other. You can do that, and you can even make money hiring yourself out to law enforcement—they’re actually paid tax dollars to set up little fake altars and teach about what your son is doing if he plays White Wolf games, and these are the signs that your kids will kill you in your sleep. But what I’m trying to do with this book is say that, if we set all that aside for a second, there’s a lot going on here with modernity. Vampires can tell us a lot about the state of modernity. Modernity’s been a gradual shift from an identity that is ascribed to one that is achieved. If you were to go to a medieval village and look at the peasants, they’re all the same religion; they’re all going to live in the same town their whole life; they don’t have to worry: are my talents going to waste, being a peasant? Nowadays, you have to discover a career; if you stay in the same town where you grew up, that’s considered a failure; if you stay in the church that your family’s from, that’s considered an inauthentic form of spirituality. There used to not be concepts or categories to describe different sexual orientations. So I see vampires as the next logical step… This is the first time in human history you’ve been able to say, maybe I’m not ontologically the same as everybody else. Bostonist: Do you expect that vampires will read your book? Laycock: Yes. Vampires are reading my book. Vampires are doing more than anybody else to promote the book. They’re happy that somebody is actually doing this in a way that’s not sensationalistic. I’ve gotten complaints that Amazon can’t get the book out fast enough. Bostonist: How do colleagues and faculty at BU feel about your research subjects being a major market for your work? Not every Catholic grandma runs out to buy Robert Orsi ’s books. Laycock: I don’t think the verdict is in on that yet. A lot of the faculty at BU have been really, really supportive of this… I told them, MTV contacted me, should I do this? And some of them were like, hell yeah you should go on MTV! Huston Smith didn’t know anything about religion, [but] he was on TV. My advisor said, basically, you need to watch it with this shit, there is a risk in having done a bunch of popular stuff, that could hurt in the job market. But there is no job market for religion professors. So I kind of don’t care. I’ve adopted almost a Marxist view about academia: once we realize that there are no tenure track jobs—that we’re doing this for nothing—then we’re finally free. We can start actually figuring out what our next move is. None of us are going to get tenure, so we might as well do what we want. Bostonist: What was the concept of the MTV show? Laycock: They said they wanted to do a show where they have an expert who goes around the country and interviews different vampires. So they needed an expert that was (a) young, and (b) not a vampire. [The woman in charge of the show, having been referred to Mr. Laycock through multiple vampire sources] contacts me, and she’s like, how old are you? And are you a vampire? This is a totally serious question, and I don’t get the job if I say, yes, I’m a vampire. That’s another point I’m making: once the category is out there, we all become non-vampires. We used to not have to think of ourselves as non-vampires. But now, if I hadn’t been a non-vampire, I couldn’t have gotten that job. There used to be no concept of homosexuality. If you’re a man, you’re supposed to have sex with women; if you have sex with a man, then you’ve sinned. And if you have sex with lots and lots of men, then you’re a sinner. But you’re not “gay.” You’re not different from other people, you’re just bad. Now we have this category of “gay,” and all of us start thinking of ourselves as “straight,” whereas before there was no concept of “straight.” Bostonist: And now we have a concept of “vampire” instead of just “people who happen to drink a lot of blood”? Laycock: Well, if you drink blood that doesn’t necessarily mean you’re a vampire. There are blood fetishists. This is something I talk about in the book: there people who used to describe themselves as vampires and now describe themselves as blood fetishists. And I’ve seen symbiotic relations form between blood fetishists and vampires. Some of my contacts have said, it’s not sexual for me, I don’t find anything sexual about this, I have to do this to maintain my health but if I happen to meet a guy who just really gets off on me cutting him and drinking his blood—it’s a symbiotic relationship. For him it’s sexual, and for the vampire it’s a health issue. Bostonist: When we were at Hampshire College, you were King of the Gamers. Does it help at all, when doing your research, to have been part of a misunderstood niche yourself? Laycock: Absolutely. In high school, I was in the Camarilla. I would go on weekends and play Vampire: The Masquerade with college kids, and that really helped because a lot of this actually comes directly from White Wolf live action games, especially the New York vampire scene. I talk about it in the book: the New York vampire scene is extremely baroque. They have courts of vampires and titles and stuff like that. And it all comes directly from White Wolf. Father Sebastian, who was a fangsmith and helped organize the New York scene and now lives in Paris—I was talking to him long-distance, [he was in] Paris and he

Originally posted here:
"We All Become Non-Vampires": Identity, Modernity, and Gamer Chicks In Corsets